If you look up the word trust in a dictionary you'll come to realize that it is a ephemeral condition in our post post modern world. When you consider the synonyms for trust such as faith, reliance, confidence and dependence, you're confronted with an uncomfortable truth : we can have no assurance (a related concept to trust) that trust should even exist or should be deserved by our leaders and institutions, by the media or, sadly, by one another.
Trust is dangerous. In a society which has been intellectually anesthetized and is incapable of critical thinking, it can be betrayed and used as an instrument of control. Critical thinking isn't easy and is sometimes uncomfortably painful. It requires sceptisism and doubt which are the antethisis of trust. It's easier and more pleasant to be disracted and escape through entertainment, drugs and reality shows.
We should challenge ourselves and question everything, ask why.
Trust requires engagement and interaction with others. It demands that we immerse ourselves in another person's struggle and that we honestly try to understand what they are experiencing. Unalloyed empathy is challenging and strangely unnatural, but it is crucial to understanding ourselves and our world, and to discovering where trust is merited.
Through our own intellectual self reliance we can begin to rediscover the humanity in man and put man at the center of civil society, at the center of existence.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Monday, August 13, 2012
Past Returns Are No Guarantee of Future Results
Five years after the beginning of the Financial Crisis and the continual manipulation and distortion of financial markets, we present asset returns for this unfortunate era. Draw your own conclusions as to the effectiveness of fiat money creation, keeping in mind that world economic growth in the same time frame has been tepid and debt to GDP ratios in the Western World have exploded.
Forget about the current level of certain asset markets and think about what returns are embedded in current valuations. Valuations (the expected discounted cash flows of an asset over the holding period) determine future returns, and in absence of the unsustainable manipulation of the last 5 years, I think it's safe to say caveat emptor. Which asset classes are "rich"?? Where's the crowded trade?? What are the known unknowns and the unknown unknowns??
Monday, January 30, 2012
We're All Subordinated (the echo of we're all subprime).
Here it Italy, investors see a 6,0% (circa) yield on a 10 year BTP and think, "Not bad. We won't default because Europe won't permit that and we're all senior in the capital structure, it's a sovereign obligation." Study closely how the default in Greece unfolds and shortly after that, watch how the negotiations for more aid or a debt restructuring in Portugal begin. The devil will truly be in the details.
The truth is that Greece's debt has been arbitrarily placed into different places in the "capital structure" of that country's sovereign obligations. If you bought Greek debt and you're not a public entity (read BCE), then when Greece restructures (read defaults), you must take your 65% haircut (only 65%?!) while the BCE and other public investors maintain their nominal maturity amount (probably). You've become subordinated even though you own the same contractual obligation.
The BCE and other public investors maintain that they've already done their part and taken their lumps trying to support GGB prices, buying in the open market at 70-80 cents on the Drachma (so to speak). Guess what other bonds the BCE "likes" to buy, Bonos, BTPs and Portugal's debt. So if /when things get ugly and it's time to go to the barber again (read get a haircut) because these sovereigns chose a "voluntary" restructuring then we'll all be subordinated again. Why? Just because. (I guess)
I understand that the "authorities" are trying to save the world, but when legality and contracts will no longer be applicable then we'll find ourselves on a dangerous slippery slope. The authorities will begin to explain to us that in the name of equality / fairness we must limit and sacrifice our rights, our freedom. Not only will our bonds be subordinated but also, ultimately, our liberty will be subordinated to the whims of the plutocrats and the kleptocrats.
Sorry for the rant.
The truth is that Greece's debt has been arbitrarily placed into different places in the "capital structure" of that country's sovereign obligations. If you bought Greek debt and you're not a public entity (read BCE), then when Greece restructures (read defaults), you must take your 65% haircut (only 65%?!) while the BCE and other public investors maintain their nominal maturity amount (probably). You've become subordinated even though you own the same contractual obligation.
The BCE and other public investors maintain that they've already done their part and taken their lumps trying to support GGB prices, buying in the open market at 70-80 cents on the Drachma (so to speak). Guess what other bonds the BCE "likes" to buy, Bonos, BTPs and Portugal's debt. So if /when things get ugly and it's time to go to the barber again (read get a haircut) because these sovereigns chose a "voluntary" restructuring then we'll all be subordinated again. Why? Just because. (I guess)
I understand that the "authorities" are trying to save the world, but when legality and contracts will no longer be applicable then we'll find ourselves on a dangerous slippery slope. The authorities will begin to explain to us that in the name of equality / fairness we must limit and sacrifice our rights, our freedom. Not only will our bonds be subordinated but also, ultimately, our liberty will be subordinated to the whims of the plutocrats and the kleptocrats.
Sorry for the rant.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Is Anyone Thinking About Japan?
I don't want to bore you with the numbers, but Japan's public debt situation is uglier than Greece's and Japan is a lot more important to the world economy than Greece (sorry). Demographics advance like a glacier and their influence on an economy are just as unstoppable. Combining deteriorating demographics (Japan), deteriorating external accounts and an unsustainably high public debt load, and you get the preconditions for more...well, problems.
Let's keep our eyes on the East, Japan and China in particular, for clues to the next phase of the financial crisis. You can't continue to borrow when your debt carrying capacity no longer exists.
Let's keep our eyes on the East, Japan and China in particular, for clues to the next phase of the financial crisis. You can't continue to borrow when your debt carrying capacity no longer exists.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Insolvency Isn't Readily Observable...Until It Is
Overnight deposits at the BCE are at all time highs and the collateral posted at the BCE is of dubious quality at best. European banks are still under capitalized and are hoarding liquidity when what they need is more capital / less leverage. The CEE is further from, not closer to an agreement on a Fiscal Union, Greece is a walking corpse. Economic growth in the Eurozone is screeching to a halt, etc., etc.
Taken in isolation, these are interesting, if not worrisome data points. Combined in a complex evolving system these anecdotes could provide the catalyst and / or accerlant for a potentially very negative outcome (or not). But maybe we should take Pascal's advice and stop worrying about the probabilities of the various outcomes and start focusing on the consequences of an improbable but very negative outcome. Maybe it's time to weigh and not to count. It's a bit like the difference between capital (solvency) and liquidity.
Taken in isolation, these are interesting, if not worrisome data points. Combined in a complex evolving system these anecdotes could provide the catalyst and / or accerlant for a potentially very negative outcome (or not). But maybe we should take Pascal's advice and stop worrying about the probabilities of the various outcomes and start focusing on the consequences of an improbable but very negative outcome. Maybe it's time to weigh and not to count. It's a bit like the difference between capital (solvency) and liquidity.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Downgrade? What downgrade?
S & P on the European downgrade (read negative opinion) writes : "We believe that a reform process based on a pillar of fiscal austerity alone risks becoming self-defeating, as domestic demand falls in line with consumers’ rising concerns about job security and disposable incomes, eroding national tax revenues."
Translation : If you piss against the wind while walking uphill, you'll probably soil yourself while sliding backwards...and the surprise will be if you don't.
Will 1 Old Euro = 1 Neuro? Only time will tell...
Translation : If you piss against the wind while walking uphill, you'll probably soil yourself while sliding backwards...and the surprise will be if you don't.
Will 1 Old Euro = 1 Neuro? Only time will tell...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)